In statistics, hypotheses about the value of the population correlation coefficient ρ between variables X and Y can be tested using the Fisher transformation [1][2] applied to the sample correlation coefficient r.
Contents |
The transformation is defined by:
where "ln" is the natural logarithm function and "artanh" is the inverse hyperbolic function.
If (X, Y) has a bivariate normal distribution, and if the (Xi, Yi) pairs used to form r are independent for i = 1, ..., n, then z is approximately normally distributed with mean
and standard error
where N is the sample size.
This transformation, and its inverse,
can be used to construct a confidence interval for ρ.
The Fisher transformation is an approximate variance-stabilizing transformation for r when X and Y follow a bivariate normal distribution. This means that the variance of z is approximately constant for all values of the population correlation coefficient ρ. Without the Fisher transformation, the variance of r grows smaller as |ρ| gets closer to 1. Since the Fisher transformation is approximately the identity function when |r| < 1/2, it is sometimes useful to remember that the variance of r is well approximated by 1/N as long as |ρ| is not too large and N is not too small. This is related to the fact that the asymptotic variance of r is 1 for bivariate normal data.
The behavior of this transform has been extensively studied since Fisher introduced it in 1915. Fisher himself found the exact distribution of z for data from a bivariate normal distribution in 1921; Gayen, 1951[3] determined the exact distribution of z for data from a bivariate Type A Edgeworth distribution. Hotelling in 1953 calculated the Taylor series expressions for the moments of z and several related statistics[4] and Hawkins in 1989 discovered the asymptotic distribution of z for virtually any data.[5]
While the Fisher transformation is mainly associated with the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient for bivariate normal observations, it can also be applied to Spearman's rank correlation coefficient in more general cases. A similar result for the asymptotic distribution applies, but with a minor adjustment factor: see the latter article for details.
|